Re: == ( No.1 ) |
- Date: 2014/02/23 03:10
- Name: Artem Pulkin
- Also instead of transmission I obtain NaN for all k at certain energy when I run TranMain_NC. What might the problem be?
|
Re: == ( No.2 ) |
- Date: 2014/02/26 20:03
- Name: Artem <artem.pulkin@epfl.ch>
- Also, is it possible to obtain spin-resolved transmission in non-collinear case?
|
Re: == ( No.3 ) |
- Date: 2014/03/17 17:14
- Name: T. Ozaki
- Hi,
> The first 20 iterations correspond to scf in periodic environment. While the NEGF part was > generally successful I am wondering if it is possible to improve convergence of the second > part somehow since it seems for me stuck in initial configuration.
You can change how many times the band scheme is employed by the following keyword.
NEGF.scf.Iter.Band 6 # defalut=6
By changing it, the behavior of SCF convergence may be controlled.
> Also instead of transmission I obtain NaN for all k at certain energy when I run > TranMain_NC. What might the problem be?
Did you check the dependency of the behavior on the imaginary part of energy which can be controlled by the third number specified by the following keyword?
NEGF.tran.energyrange -10 10 1.0e-3
> Also, is it possible to obtain spin-resolved transmission in non-collinear case?
No it isn't. But you may be able to modify the code of TranMain_NC to get the information.
Regards,
TO
|
|