Re: Vacuum level ( No.1 ) |
- Date: 2014/04/05 02:21
- Name: Alfonso Sanchez <alfonso.sanchez@tyndall.ie>
- Regarding question 2) : I've managed to read the data with VESTA.
Is there any way to relate the value for the chemical potential printed in *.out to the 0 of energy in band structure plots? (as generated with bandgnu13)
|
Re: Vacuum level ( No.2 ) |
- Date: 2014/04/16 06:44
- Name: T. Ozaki
- Hi,
> But I'm not sure what "adding one layer of basis functions from the top most layer" > means. Is it that that this layer must be added directly on top of the slab and > vhart will be "zero" (vacuum) there? or add the empty orbitals there and "measure" > the vacuum level at > the centre of the vacuum separating the slab from its periodic images? I'm confused by > the whole thing really.
Imagine you have infinite bulk along z-direction illustrated by .... o0 o1 o2 o3 o4 o5 o6 o7 o8 o9 o10 o11 o12 o13 ....... where o means an atom, and .... means the infinity. Then, you cut the bulk to create the surface as o5 o6 o7 o8 o9 This is a slab model. Now we add the empty atoms as x4 o5 o6 o7 o8 o9 x10 where x means the empty atom, and the positions of x4 and x10 are the same as o4 and o10, respectively.
This illustration is for a simple clean surface with no surface reconstruction. For general cases, we can determine the position of empty atoms by assuming the clean surface with no surface reconstruction. Fortunately, a subtle difference in the choice of position does not change largely the calculated value of work function. We have tested the scheme to calculate work functions of a wide variety of metallic surfaces, and obtained results well compared to plane wave calculations.
> Is there any way to relate the value for the chemical potential printed in *.out to > the 0 of energy in band structure plots? (as generated with bandgnu13)
The 0 of energy in band structure is nothing but the chemical potential in *.out.
Best regards,
TO
|
Re: Vacuum level ( No.3 ) |
- Date: 2014/04/16 06:28
- Name: Alfonso Sanchez <alfonso.sanchez@tyndall.ie>
- Thank you Prof. Ozaki, that was very clear.
|
|