Re: Bulk transport system ( No.1 ) |
- Date: 2015/07/06 19:07
- Name: Artem Pulkin
- 1) In OpenMX the width of the channel is defined by the central section plus both leads. Of course the scattering region should contain some portion of leads (i.e. several unit cells), such that your final results (transmission) do not change upon adding more atoms to both sides of your channel.
2) a. yes; b. the results should be different; c. no
Artem
|
Re: Bulk transport system ( No.2 ) |
- Date: 2015/07/06 19:45
- Name: Khalid <kimu206@gmail.com>
- Dear Sir,
Thank you very much for your reply, but please ask me another thing. If I want to calculate the bulk transport with zero bias, can I apply an electric field from z direction by the key-word:
scf. Electric.Field 0 0 1 ?
I mean is there any theoretical conflict using this command in bulk transmission case?
Thanks in advance
Khalid
|
Re: Bulk transport system ( No.3 ) |
- Date: 2015/07/06 20:24
- Name: Artem Pulkin
- I do not see any conflict for having transverse electric field. But it looks like it is not implemented in openmx. The only option so far is an empirical gate voltage through 'NEGF.gate.voltage'.
Artem
|
Re: Bulk transport system ( No.4 ) |
- Date: 2015/07/07 02:51
- Name: Khalid <kimu206@gmail.com>
- Dear Sir,
Thank you very much for your kind reply
Khalid
|