Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.1 ) |
- Date: 2015/11/05 01:41
- Name: Artem Pulkin
- It is likely that you did not turn the spinorbit coupling on.
scf.spinorbit.coupling on
|
Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.2 ) |
- Date: 2015/11/05 07:53
- Name: Will
- Here, I am just using scf.SpinPolarization on. Why do I need to use the spinorbit coupling in this case?
|
Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.3 ) |
- Date: 2015/11/05 18:48
- Name: Artem Pulkin
- Why do you expect magnetic moments? Isn't it due to SOC in Mo?
|
Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.4 ) |
- Date: 2015/11/05 22:54
- Name: Will
- No. In the reference, the authors also calculated the magnetic moments without considering SOC.
|
Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.5 ) |
- Date: 2015/11/06 19:24
- Name: Artem Pulkin
- In that paper they do not mention spin-orbit coupling at all. What they do is they compare energies for spin-polarized (with SOC as far as I could see from the band structure) and spin-unpolarized calculations. Please correct me if I am wrong.
|
Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.6 ) |
- Date: 2015/11/06 21:55
- Name: Will
- Yes, in the paper, they do not mention the spin-orbit coupling, then how can we imagine that the spin-polarized calculation is with SOC? Also, in Fig. 1 (c), the authors mentioned "Spatial spin distribution (up-down) of 8-ZMoS2NR", if they considered the SOC, can they still use up-down?
Thanks, Will
|
Re: magnetic property of zigzag MoS2 nanoribbon ( No.7 ) |
- Date: 2015/11/07 00:35
- Name: Artem Pulkin
- Regarding your first question, no, I am not going to convince you any more that you should use SOC. If you have a question about the paper please ask the authors.
Regarding your second question, yes, the magnetic moments (or spins) may point up and down and any other direction. For a scalar-relativistic treatment they point up or down only (usually this means along z axis), in non-relativistic treatment there are no spins at all as far as I know.
|