Top Page > Browsing

Memory Consumption Date: 2019/05/01 14:17 Name: Reza Dear Developers, I tested my input file with two format of FRAC and Ang for my conventional scf and neb calculations. Whenever I use FRAC, my memory consumption increases more than twice! and for neb calculation, whenever I use "MD.NEB.Parallel.Number 1" on my small system, compiler prints all the output twice. Whenever I use "MD.NEB.Parallel.Number 2" everything is OK. It seems that something in the code prevents that "MD.NEB.Parallel.Number 1" to be used and insist for image paralleling at least with two images. I tested above points on 4-core system without thread, and 16 core system which has 8 real core and 8 threads. I tested with intel cluster studio 2015 and 2019 compilers. Maybe above points help for the main problem of this interesting fast code which is memory consumption. Thanks Reza

Page: [1]

Re: Memory Consumption ( No.1 ) Date: 2019/05/01 14:56 Name: Reza I am confused!! May be my compiler has a serious problem. I used AU instead of Ang (converted all Ang data to Bohr), and get faster and less-memory results!! Could you please check it. Thanks Reza Re: Memory Consumption ( No.2 ) Date: 2019/05/01 15:35 Name: Naoya Yamaguchi Dear Reza, Usually, OpenMX begin to calculate systems after converting the all units of coordinates to AU, and the conversion is just a mathematical process, so I wonder if you might pass different ones to OpenMX. For example, if one change a parameter for "Atoms.SpeciesAndCoordinates.Unit", one should also change "Atoms.UnitVectors.Unit". Regards, Naoya Yamaguchi Re: Memory Consumption ( No.3 ) Date: 2019/05/03 02:42 Name: Reza Thanks, Problem solved.

Page: [1]