Re: too short distance between atoms warning ( No.1 ) |
- Date: 2022/01/19 18:26
- Name: Naoya Yamaguchi
- Hi,
It means that a distance of atoms 93 and 89 is too short and 0 Bohr. You need to check if the input atomic coordinates are correct.
Regards, Naoya Yamaguchi
|
Re: too short distance between atoms warning ( No.2 ) |
- Date: 2022/01/19 22:06
- Name: Jack
- Hi.
Thank you for the reply. Those are standard input coordinates of the Diamond structure, with all the known parameters. Could there be another parameter in the input file that affects the distance between atoms?
Thank you
|
Re: too short distance between atoms warning ( No.3 ) |
- Date: 2022/01/20 01:56
- Name: Naoya Yamaguchi
- Dear Jack,
>Could there be another parameter in the input file that affects the distance between atoms? There are cell vectors. Distances between atoms are determined from the atomic coordinates and cell vectors. A case of duplicate atoms is a common problem.
Regards, Naoya Yamaguchi
|
Re: too short distance between atoms warning ( No.4 ) |
- Date: 2022/01/20 03:37
- Name: Jack
- Hi,
I am using the following atom coordnates: 1 C 0 0 0 2 2 2 C 0 0 3.567 2 2 3 C 0 3.567 0 2 2 4 C 0 3.567 3.567 2 2 5 C 3.567 0 0 2 2 6 C 3.567 0 3.567 2 2 7 C 3.567 3.567 0 2 2 8 C 3.567 3.567 3.567 2 2 9 C 0 1.7835 1.7835 2 2 10 C 3.567 1.7835 1.7835 2 2 11 C 1.7835 1.7835 0 2 2 12 C 1.7835 1.7835 3.567 2 2 13 C 1.7835 0 1.7835 2 2 14 C 1.7835 3.567 1.7835 2 2 15 C 2.67525 0.89175 2.67525 2 2 16 C 0.89175 0.89175 0.89175 2 2 17 C 0.89175 2.67525 2.67525 2 2 18 C 2.67525 2.67525 0.89175 2 2
and the following cell vectors: <Atoms.UnitVectors 3.567 0 0 0 3.567 0 0 0 3.567 Atoms.UnitVectors>
are these correct?
Thank you very much
|
Re: too short distance between atoms warning ( No.5 ) |
- Date: 2022/01/20 16:23
- Name: Naoya Yamaguchi
- Dear Jack,
For example, if the units are ang., atoms 1-8 are duplicate.
Regards, Naoya Yamaguchi
|
Re: too short distance between atoms warning ( No.6 ) |
- Date: 2022/01/20 18:47
- Name: Jack
- Hello,
Thank you. I ran another calculation without atoms 1 to 8, and the warning did not appear. When I tried to run unit cell optimization (using RFC5) on the first MD step the warning did not appear, but on the second MD step (and forward) it appeared again. Other than that, on the 10th MD step, the dUele is 0 in every SCF step, and the calculation gets terminated due to the illegal SCF calculation. What could be the issue?
Thank you very much
|
Re: too short distance between atoms warning ( No.7 ) |
- Date: 2022/01/20 19:34
- Name: Naoya Yamaguchi
- Dear Jack,
There remain duplicate ones such as atoms 11 and 12, for example. In the simple cubic call with the lattice constant of 3.567 ang., there should be 8 atoms for the pristine diamond case. You need to check your structure carefully.
Regards, Naoya Yamaguchi
|