| 
|  Re: STM image - energy window  ( No.1 ) |  |  Date: 2022/08/04 21:55 Name: T. Ozaki
 
Hi, 
 As written in the manual, the energy window is always taken from the chemical potential.
 So, such a specification, "partial.charge.energy.window -0.3 -0.1 # in eV", does not work properly.
 
 There is another way to calculate the charge density between -0.3 and -0.1 eV.
 The first step is to perform the calculation with "partial.charge.energy.window -0.3", giving the density bewtween -0.3 and 0.0,
 where 0.0 corresponds to the chemical potential. Similary, the second calculation is performed with "partial.charge.energy.window -0.1",
 giving the density bewtween -0.1 and 0.0. After the two calculations, you can get two corresponding cube files.
 Then, you can follow the procedure explained at http://www.openmx-square.org/openmx_man3.9/node209.html to calculate the difference
 bewtween the charge densities stored in the two cube files. The resultant cube file stores the charge density between -0.3 and -0.1.
 
 Regards,
 
 TO
 
 |  |  Re: STM image - energy window  ( No.2 ) |  |  Date: 2022/08/04 22:39 Name: Michele Amato  <michele.amato@u-psud.fr>
 
Dear Prof. Ozaki, 
 Thank you so much for your quick reply.
 Now everything is clear.
 
 Kind regards,
 Michele
 |  |