Re: large systems ( No.1 ) |
- Date: 2006/11/09 11:04
- Name: T.Ozaki
- Hi,
Maybe yours is a memory problem. For the system consisting of 160 atoms, the conventional scheme is still faster than the O(N) method.
Regards,
TO
|
Re: large systems ( No.2 ) |
- Date: 2006/11/10 07:20
- Name: JessK
Hi,
Indeed I tried to use 'band' scheme first, and the code used all my memory. So, i thought O(N) could help.
thanks, JK
|
Re: large systems ( No.3 ) |
- Date: 2007/01/13 01:27
- Name: jessK
Dr. Ozaki,
Yes, I realized that it is a memory issue. Using the cluster with 8Gb on each node I was able to run it (slow, but works). But on usual PC cluster with medium amount of memory (~4Gb) it is a big challenge, because the memory is not distributed over the nodes (so, increasing numbero of CPUs doesn't help). In fact, calculations of the same system with usual plane-wave code require much smaller amount of memory (~2Gb on node). This situation kills my attempts to apply OpenMX for the research. Is it possible to trace, why the code needs such huge amount of memory?
thanks, JK
|
|