Top Page > Browsing
Why the Dirac point of pristine monolayer graphene is above the Fermi level
Date: 2024/09/01 00:38
Name: Kieran   <skn_neu@hotmail.co.uk>

Dear All,

I am running the test calculation of the band structure for the pristine monolayer graphene with 4 by 4 by 1 supercell. This is my input file.

# File Name
System.CurrrentDirectory        ./    # default=./
System.Name                      SLG_441
level.of.stdout                  1    # default=1 (1-3)
level.of.fileout                  0    # default=1 (0-2)
DATA.PATH                        /public21/soft/openmx/openmx3.9/DFT_DATA19/

Species.Number      1
# Definition of Atomic Species
<Definition.of.Atomic.Species
C  C6.0-s3p2d2 C_PBE19
Definition.of.Atomic.Species>

# Atoms
Atoms.Number        32
Atoms.SpeciesAndCoordinates.Unit  Ang # Ang|AU
<Atoms.SpeciesAndCoordinates
1  C  0.0000000000      0.0000000000    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
2  C  1.2300000367      0.7101408633    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
3  C  -1.2300000000      2.1304225263    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
4  C  0.0000000367      2.8405633896    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
5  C  -2.4600000000      4.2608450527    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
6  C  -1.2299999633      4.9709859160    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
7  C  -3.6900000000      6.3912675790    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
8  C  -2.4599999633      7.1014084423    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
9  C  2.4600000000      0.0000000000    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
10 C  3.6900000367      0.7101408633    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
11 C  1.2300000000      2.1304225263    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
12 C  2.4600000367      2.8405633896    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
13 C  0.0000000000      4.2608450527    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
14 C  1.2300000367      4.9709859160    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
15 C  -1.2300000000      6.3912675790    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
16 C  0.0000000367      7.1014084423    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
17 C  4.9200000000      0.0000000000    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
18 C  6.1500000367      0.7101408633    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
19 C  3.6900000000      2.1304225263    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
20 C  4.9200000367      2.8405633896    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
21 C  2.4600000000      4.2608450527    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
22 C  3.6900000367      4.9709859160    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
23 C  1.2300000000      6.3912675790    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
24 C  2.4600000367      7.1014084423    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
25 C  7.3800000000      0.0000000000    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
26 C  8.6100000367      0.7101408633    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
27 C  6.1500000000      2.1304225263    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
28 C  7.3800000367      2.8405633896    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
29 C  4.9200000000      4.2608450527    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
30 C  6.1500000367      4.9709859160    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
31 C  3.6900000000      6.3912675790    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
32 C  4.9200000367      7.1014084423    11.7000000000 2.0 2.0
Atoms.SpeciesAndCoordinates>
Atoms.UnitVectors.Unit            Ang # Ang|AU
<Atoms.UnitVectors                   
  9.8400000000      0.0000000000      0.0000000000
  -4.9200000000      8.5216901054      0.0000000000
  0.0000000000      0.0000000000    23.4000000000
Atoms.UnitVectors>

# SCF or Electronic System
scf.XcType                  LDA        # LDA|LSDA-CA|LSDA-PW|GGA-PBE
scf.SpinPolarization        off        # On|Off|NC
scf.ElectronicTemperature  600.0      # default=300 (K)
scf.energycutoff          350.0      # default=150 (Ry)
scf.maxIter                100        # default=40
scf.EigenvalueSolver      Band        # DC|GDC|Cluster|Band
scf.lapack.dste            dstevx      # dstegr|dstedc|dstevx, default=dstegr
scf.Kgrid                  100 1 1    # means n1 x n2 x n3
scf.Mixing.Type          rmm-diisk    # Simple|Rmm-Diis|Gr-Pulay|Kerker|Rmm-Diisk
scf.Init.Mixing.Weight    0.010      # default=0.30
scf.Min.Mixing.Weight      0.001      # default=0.001
scf.Max.Mixing.Weight      0.020      # default=0.40
scf.Mixing.History          20        # default=5
scf.Mixing.StartPulay        7        # default=6
scf.criterion            1.0e-10      # default=1.0e-6 (Hartree)

# MD or Geometry Optimization
MD.Type              Nomd  # Opt|EF|BFGS|RF|DIIS
MD.Opt.DIIS.History  6    # default=3
MD.Opt.StartDIIS      7    # default=5
MD.Opt.EveryDIIS      6    # default=10
MD.maxIter            100  #
MD.Opt.criterion    1.0e-4  # default=1.0e-4 (a.u.)
<MD.Fixed.XYZ
1  1 1 1
2  1 1 1
3  1 1 1
4  1 1 1
5  1 1 1
6  1 1 1
7  1 1 1
8  1 1 1
9  1 1 1
10 1 1 1
11 1 1 1
12 1 1 1
13 1 1 1
14 1 1 1
15 1 1 1
16 1 1 1
17 1 1 1
18 1 1 1
19 1 1 1
20 1 1 1
21 1 1 1
22 1 1 1
23 1 1 1
24 1 1 1
25 1 1 1
26 1 1 1
27 1 1 1
28 1 1 1
29 1 1 1
30 1 1 1
31 1 1 1
32 1 1 1
MD.Fixed.XYZ>

# Band dispersion
Band.dispersion              on      # on|off, default=off
Band.Nkpath          2
<Band.kpath               
  100  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3333333333 0.3333333333 0.0 G K
  100  0.3333333333 0.3333333333 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 K M
Band.kpath>

# DOS and PDOS
Dos.fileout                  off      # on|off, default=off
Dos.Erange              -15.0  25.0  # default = -20 20
Dos.Kgrid                600 1  1      # default = Kgrid1 Kgrid2 Kgrid3
DosGauss.fileout      off
DosGauss.Num.Mesh    4000
DosGauss.Width      0.01

After the calculation, I extracted the band structure and found that the Dirac point of the monolayer graphene is 0.035 eV above the Fermi energy level. The dirac point actually should be located at Fermi energy level.

Is this problem from the pseudopotential or something else? Would anyone please give me some suggestions/comments, according to my input file?

Thank you in advance.

Kieran
ƒƒ“ƒe
Page: [1]

Thread Title (must) Move the thread to the top
Your Name (must)
E-Mail (must)
URL
Password (used in modification of the submitted text)
Comment (must)

   Save Cookie