Re: Calculation of XPS absolute BE on surface slab ( No.1 ) |
- Date: 2025/01/30 21:24
- Name: T. Ozaki
- Hi,
For the final state calculation, there are two ways:
One is to treat the system as insulator for which the parameters can be set as
scf.restart on scf.restart.filename init scf.coulomb.cutoff on scf.core.hole on
<core.hole.state 38 s 1 core.hole.state>
scf.system.charge 1.0 # default=0.0
The system charge needs to be set 1.0 rather than 0.0.
The second way is to treat the system as metal for which the parameters can be set as
scf.restart off scf.restart.filename init scf.coulomb.cutoff off scf.core.hole on
<core.hole.state 38 s 1 core.hole.state>
scf.system.charge 0.0 # default=0.0
Could you try both of them, and report the results?
Regards,
TO
|
Re: Calculation of XPS absolute BE on surface slab ( No.2 ) |
- Date: 2025/02/05 15:53
- Name: Harry <harry@cp.prec.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp>
- Dear Prof. Ozaki,
Thank you for kind reply. I'm sorry I don't notice the reply on this forum sooner.
Below is the result of my calculation:
************ Assuming the insulator case ****************** init.out: Enpy. -4186.020932596960 Ha finalC1.out: Enpy. -4175.415962204526 Ha
The chemical potential in init.out: -0.14713639562808 Ha
The BE: final - init + mu = 284.57 eV.
************ Assuming the metal case ****************** init.out: Enpy. -4186.020000858669 finalC1.out: Enpy. -4175.589606084631
The BE: final - init = 283.82 eV
The insulator treatment gives better agreement with experiment of 285.0 eV. I have tried to change the basis set, change the cutoff energy, change the size of unit cell but the result does not change so much.
I think I should put +1.0 charge to my system. I would appreciate if you have any comment or suggestion. Thank you again for your suggestion.
With best regards,
Harry
|
Re: Calculation of XPS absolute BE on surface slab ( No.3 ) |
- Date: 2025/02/05 21:34
- Name: T. Ozaki
- Hi,
It should be noted that the calculated binding energies do not always exhibit good agreement with the experimental values. As shown in https://www.openmx-square.org/vps_pao_core2019/B/index.html large deviation can be seen in some cases. Also, a variation can be found even in experimental values. Rather than being elated or discouraged by the agreement of individual data, it would be better to assess the data as a whole, while keeping the computational condition.
Regards,
TO
|
Re: Calculation of XPS absolute BE on surface slab ( No.4 ) |
- Date: 2025/02/06 17:58
- Name: Harry <harry@cp.prec.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp>
- Dear Prof. Ozaki,
Thank you for the reply. I understand your points. Then I will proceed with my calculations.
Thank you again for your help.
Best regards,
Harry
|