This thread is locked.Only browsing is available.
Top Page > Browsing
One more question about the "Note on Recursion Methods"
Date: 2007/10/07 15:43
Name: Yang Xu   <yangxu@uiuc.edu>

Dear Prof. Ozaki,

Thank you very much. I really appreciate your answer.

I just have one more question. It is really important for us.

I am wondering if there is a mistake in Eq. (2.37) on page 40 of your notes, should the \hat{H} be \hat{H'} where H'=S^{-1}H ?

To compute the |r_n) in Eq.(2.37), we need first explicitly compute H' by using H'=S^{-1}*H, right?


Your timely reply will be highly appreciated!!

Best regards,

Yang Xu

メンテ
Page: [1]

Re: One more question about the "Note on Recursion Methods" ( No.1 )
Date: 2007/10/21 09:56
Name: T.Ozaki

Hi,

> I am wondering if there is a mistake in Eq. (2.37) on page 40 of your notes,
> should the \hat{H} be \hat{H'} where H'=S^{-1}H ?

It is correct as the symbolic notation, since the state in the left-hand side is written
by the dual vector. But, your guess is right in practice since the original basis
is used to represent the Hamiltonian.

> To compute the |r_n) in Eq.(2.37), we need first explicitly
> compute H' by using H'=S^{-1}*H, right?

Instead, the following second step calculation can reduce the computational time.
(i) (V| = (Un|S^{-1}
(ii) (V|H
But, as the recursion level is comparable to the matrix size of original Hamiltonian,
they become comparable each other with respect to computational time.

Regards,

TO
メンテ

Page: [1]